<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Killing the story line: Art, strategy, common sense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2008/07/30/killing-the-story-line-art-strategy-common-sense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2008/07/30/killing-the-story-line-art-strategy-common-sense/</link>
	<description>The Intersection Between Public Relations and the News Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: bconrad</title>
		<link>http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2008/07/30/killing-the-story-line-art-strategy-common-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>bconrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/?p=140#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more. This particular reporter had a fetish for being obnoxious, unreasonable and outright untruthful -- to the point of setting off another reporter out to investigate his story accuracy. 

We eventually refused to talk to him altogether -- but were free as birds with other outlets in town -- after too many facts got in the way of fanciful stories. 

As a rule, I tend to bend over backwards for members of the news media, sometimes to a fault. About 85 percent of the reporters I deal with are stand-up folks.

Thanks for your reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. This particular reporter had a fetish for being obnoxious, unreasonable and outright untruthful &#8212; to the point of setting off another reporter out to investigate his story accuracy. </p>
<p>We eventually refused to talk to him altogether &#8212; but were free as birds with other outlets in town &#8212; after too many facts got in the way of fanciful stories. </p>
<p>As a rule, I tend to bend over backwards for members of the news media, sometimes to a fault. About 85 percent of the reporters I deal with are stand-up folks.</p>
<p>Thanks for your reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Final Spin</title>
		<link>http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2008/07/30/killing-the-story-line-art-strategy-common-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Final Spin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/?p=140#comment-185</guid>
		<description>My current media relations doctrine is that it never hurts to answer questions and discuss issues with reporters, even those who are fairly hostile. It produces good results and on a few specific occasions, it clearly produced far better coverage than we would have had otherwise.

However, there were a few rare occasions when I realized that discretion was the better part of valour, when &quot;no - just no&quot; is the best answer. You provide an excellent example of when it&#039;s a good option.

Great post!

Final Spin
www.finalspin.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My current media relations doctrine is that it never hurts to answer questions and discuss issues with reporters, even those who are fairly hostile. It produces good results and on a few specific occasions, it clearly produced far better coverage than we would have had otherwise.</p>
<p>However, there were a few rare occasions when I realized that discretion was the better part of valour, when &#8220;no &#8211; just no&#8221; is the best answer. You provide an excellent example of when it&#8217;s a good option.</p>
<p>Great post!</p>
<p>Final Spin<br />
<a href="http://www.finalspin.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.finalspin.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

