<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PRSA Throws Down to Obama and McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2008/09/11/prsa-throws-down-to-obama-and-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2008/09/11/prsa-throws-down-to-obama-and-mccain/</link>
	<description>The Intersection Between Public Relations and the News Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Why McCain and Obama aren't answering to PRSA</title>
		<link>http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2008/09/11/prsa-throws-down-to-obama-and-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Why McCain and Obama aren't answering to PRSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/?p=204#comment-258</guid>
		<description>Neither the McCain or Obama campaign will sign any such pledge &quot;obligating them to abide by the PRSA Code of Ethics in their campaign communications.&quot;

That&#039;s because presidential candidates have no reason to treat PRSA as the voice of the influence industry, much less its moral authority.  The truth is that PRSA is none of these things...

(Read the full column at Scatterbox: Field notes from the PR &amp; Influence Industry at www.stevensilvers.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither the McCain or Obama campaign will sign any such pledge &#8220;obligating them to abide by the PRSA Code of Ethics in their campaign communications.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s because presidential candidates have no reason to treat PRSA as the voice of the influence industry, much less its moral authority.  The truth is that PRSA is none of these things&#8230;</p>
<p>(Read the full column at Scatterbox: Field notes from the PR &amp; Influence Industry at <a href="http://www.stevensilvers.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.stevensilvers.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

