<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 New Media Facts and Fallacies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2009/01/10/5-new-media-facts-and-fallacies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2009/01/10/5-new-media-facts-and-fallacies/</link>
	<description>The Intersection Between Public Relations and the News Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McDowell</title>
		<link>http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2009/01/10/5-new-media-facts-and-fallacies/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McDowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/?p=411#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Good post, Bob. It really does make me think about the progression and the realities of what we are calling &quot;new media&quot; or &quot;social media.&quot; I suppose it really comes down to the adage of &quot;knowledge is power.&quot; Which, is really about those with the information held the power. We have long struggled to keep information from being monopolized, and therefore power monopolized. I guess we have been seeing either an increase in tools, or awareness of tools, that is causing us to be enamored lately with &quot;new media&quot; (even though, as you state, it is not really new). We are able to &quot;socially&quot; share information with greater ease (ie - seemingly infinite forms of immediate self-publishing), and not always depending on a finite number of sources. 

At any rate, I enjoyed this post, and it helps to put some of these new media movements in historical context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Bob. It really does make me think about the progression and the realities of what we are calling &#8220;new media&#8221; or &#8220;social media.&#8221; I suppose it really comes down to the adage of &#8220;knowledge is power.&#8221; Which, is really about those with the information held the power. We have long struggled to keep information from being monopolized, and therefore power monopolized. I guess we have been seeing either an increase in tools, or awareness of tools, that is causing us to be enamored lately with &#8220;new media&#8221; (even though, as you state, it is not really new). We are able to &#8220;socially&#8221; share information with greater ease (ie &#8211; seemingly infinite forms of immediate self-publishing), and not always depending on a finite number of sources. </p>
<p>At any rate, I enjoyed this post, and it helps to put some of these new media movements in historical context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

