<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Myths of CEO Compensation, Part III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2009/05/22/the-myths-of-ceo-compensation-part-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2009/05/22/the-myths-of-ceo-compensation-part-iii/</link>
	<description>The Intersection Between Public Relations and the News Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:57:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: OSMAN DENIZTEKIN</title>
		<link>http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2009/05/22/the-myths-of-ceo-compensation-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>OSMAN DENIZTEKIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/?p=802#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>So what Mr. Sowell&#039;s account boils down to is: Damned if you do (keep the failing CEO in place) and damned if you don&#039;t (and fire him with a hefty compensation package as good riddance alimony.) Either way it&#039;s the stakeholders&#039; money (or even taxpayers&#039; money, when the corporation needs to be bailed out thanks to the same CEO and cohorts)  that is paid in return for failure. As for celebrities&#039; compensation, Mr. Sowell is just spining the facts: If Michael Jordan or M.Moore earned tens of millions a year, it was because the former&#039;s team (Chicago Bulls) got 6 NBA titles in 8 years; and the latter&#039;s documentaries had very good box office returns. Do you think either of them could have earned as much if they hadn&#039;t? It amazes me how sometimes the best educated people can overlook the simplest facts and come up with such uneducated arguments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what Mr. Sowell&#8217;s account boils down to is: Damned if you do (keep the failing CEO in place) and damned if you don&#8217;t (and fire him with a hefty compensation package as good riddance alimony.) Either way it&#8217;s the stakeholders&#8217; money (or even taxpayers&#8217; money, when the corporation needs to be bailed out thanks to the same CEO and cohorts)  that is paid in return for failure. As for celebrities&#8217; compensation, Mr. Sowell is just spining the facts: If Michael Jordan or M.Moore earned tens of millions a year, it was because the former&#8217;s team (Chicago Bulls) got 6 NBA titles in 8 years; and the latter&#8217;s documentaries had very good box office returns. Do you think either of them could have earned as much if they hadn&#8217;t? It amazes me how sometimes the best educated people can overlook the simplest facts and come up with such uneducated arguments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/2009/05/22/the-myths-of-ceo-compensation-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegoodthebadthespin.com/?p=802#comment-884</guid>
		<description>OK, I agree that Michael Moore&#039;s comments were disingenuous. But to claim that greed isn&#039;t a factor in corporate compensation schemes and to say that this is a simple issue of supply and demand is to ignore the underlying problem: unbridled capitalism itself. In the words of genius economic professor Willem Houwink: &quot;Capitalism is extraordinarily cruel.&quot;

I say this as someone who believes in entrepreneurship and capitalism -- but not in the unrestrained form that led to the global economic meltdown, or that keeps the majority of Mexicans in poverty, for example.

The claim that criticism of celebrities&#039; salaries is &quot;almost unheard of&quot; makes me discount Sowell&#039;s other remarks. What ivory tower is he living in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I agree that Michael Moore&#8217;s comments were disingenuous. But to claim that greed isn&#8217;t a factor in corporate compensation schemes and to say that this is a simple issue of supply and demand is to ignore the underlying problem: unbridled capitalism itself. In the words of genius economic professor Willem Houwink: &#8220;Capitalism is extraordinarily cruel.&#8221;</p>
<p>I say this as someone who believes in entrepreneurship and capitalism &#8212; but not in the unrestrained form that led to the global economic meltdown, or that keeps the majority of Mexicans in poverty, for example.</p>
<p>The claim that criticism of celebrities&#8217; salaries is &#8220;almost unheard of&#8221; makes me discount Sowell&#8217;s other remarks. What ivory tower is he living in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

